The Encyclopedia Was Our Google — And Dad Was Our Search Engine

You know you’re not a digital native when the word “research” makes you smell paper and hear the satisfying thud of a heavy book landing on a table. Welcome to my childhood, where curiosity was rewarded not with Wi-Fi, but with a stack of alphabetically-organized mystery bricks called encyclopedias.

Let me take you back. The year? Somewhere in the analog era. The place? Our living room, where we had the entire Bertelsmann encyclopedia collection proudly displayed like it was the crown jewel of human knowledge. We didn’t just own knowledge—we subscribed to it. One glorious volume arrived each month, like an academic advent calendar for nerdy children. Volume “A” to “Z,” with deep sighs of longing in between.

I swear, I still remember the day Volume “P” arrived. I rushed to the mailbox like I was expecting a letter from a secret admirer. Nope. Just got the lowdown on Photosynthesis and Peru. But did that stop me from doing a dramatic reading of it over dinner? No, it did not.

My father—bless his analog heart—was our household’s search engine. You wanted to know something? You didn’t "Google it." You "Go-Ask-Dad-It." And then Dad would launch into his signature move: rubbing his chin thoughtfully, then walking over to the encyclopedias like he was Gandalf consulting the archives of Minas Tirith.

“Ah yes,” he’d say, pulling down the appropriate volume. “Let’s look under ‘C’ for comet,” or whatever I had asked about, probably prompted by a cartoon or a weird-shaped cloud.

And then, like magic, the pages would turn. Cross-references would be consulted. We might even pull out a second volume if the first one said, “See also: Gravity.” Ooh, it was a multi-volume kind of night.

I still remember how exciting it felt. The hunt! The discovery! The slight paper cuts! Research was an adventure, not a five-second scroll down Wikipedia followed by a 90-second TikTok spiral. (Though let’s be honest, I can fall down a TikTok spiral with the best of them. But that’s another blog post.)

The encyclopedia taught me more than facts. It taught me patience, curiosity, and the thrill of knowledge that didn’t blink at you with cookie permissions and 17 pop-up ads. And Dad taught me how to chase answers—to flip pages, follow trails, and enjoy the journey.

So now, as a writer, when I go down a research rabbit hole (and I do—like, “did they have deodorant in 1863?” or “how long does it take to poison someone with nutmeg?”), I sometimes channel that younger me. The kid sitting cross-legged on the carpet, flipping through Bertelsmann’s finest, pencil in hand, asking Dad:

“Can we look up ghosts next?”

And of course, he’d say yes.

Comments

Writers, Don’t Be a Slave to Word Count: Let the Story Speak for Itself

As writers, we’ve all asked ourselves that nagging question: “Is my book long enough? Too short? How long should it be?” It’s easy to get caught up in the numbers, obsessing over whether our work fits neatly into arbitrary word count guidelines. But here’s the truth: Word count should never dictate the quality of your story. The heart of storytelling lies in the narrative itself, not in how many pages it spans. The Pressure of Word Count From NaNoWriMo goals to publishing industry standards, writers face constant reminders about “acceptable” word counts. A novel must be 80,000-100,000 words. A novella shouldn’t exceed 40,000. Short stories have their own limits. These guidelines are helpful, but they can also be stifling. We begin to pad scenes unnecessarily or trim meaningful moments just to conform to these benchmarks. I’ve been there. I’ve wrestled with my manuscript, forcing it to stretch or condense to meet expectations. And you know what happened? The authenticity of the...

The Glamorous Life of a Writer (Or, Mostly Just Staring at a Screen)

There’s a persistent rumor floating around that writers live thrilling, adventure-filled lives. Perhaps it’s all the dramatic author portraits on book jackets—moody, windswept, staring off into the distance as if contemplating the fate of the world. Perhaps it’s the movies, where writers are always dashing off to Paris to write the next great novel in a charming café (suspiciously never interrupted by spotty Wi-Fi or overpriced croissants). I hate to break it to you, but real writing? Not quite so cinematic. In reality, my writing days mostly involve staring intensely at my screen, willing the words to appear through sheer force of will. Occasionally, I engage in deep philosophical debates with myself—such as whether my protagonist should turn left or right down a hallway (the fate of the fictional world depends on it). And let’s not forget the highly intellectual process of naming characters, which can take hours because somehow every single name I think of is either the name of ...

Winter Blues and the Creative Spirit

This winter really kicked my rear end . I don’t know if it was actually colder, longer, and snowier than usual or if it just felt that way, but either way, I felt drained. A kind of low-grade listlessness settled over me, the kind that makes it hard to muster enthusiasm for much of anything. My creativity? It all but hibernated. I’ve always been a summer person. I thrive when the sun is shining, when I can get outside and move, when nature feels alive and bursting with possibility. There’s something about stepping into warm air that sparks energy in me, making ideas flow as easily as the breeze through the trees. But winter? Winter is different. The days are short, the nights are long, and the cold seeps into everything. Even with the glow of holiday lights or the beauty of fresh snow, I find myself counting down to spring. I try to embrace the season—hot tea, cozy blankets, the occasional twinkling snowfall—but the truth is, I have to actively fight my way through these three months...

Thinkingdog Publishing

Search This Blog