Skip to main content

Wild Paths and Cozy Mysteries: A Love Letter to Unpaved Trails (and Possibly Outdated Ideals)

I live in a beautiful place. Like breathtaking sunrise over the lake while birds sing your personal soundtrack kind of beautiful. And no, I am not writing this from the balcony of my lakeside mansion while sipping artisanal espresso made by a butler named Giles. I live here because I moved in when this part of town was considered “the wrong side of the tracks.” Back then, the only things appreciating the view were me, a couple of squirrels, and a retired guy named Bob who walked shirtless year-round (we never spoke of winter).

But I got lucky. I settled in, built a life, and now I get to walk to a little sliver of land—what I call my nature recharge zone. It’s got a trail (sort of), trees that lean in like gossiping grandmothers, hedges bursting with birds, and a beach the size of a postage stamp. In short, it's perfect.

WAS perfect.

Enter: The Town.

Cue the menacing music.

The town, in its infinite and completely questionable wisdom, has decided to “beautify” this space. That’s local government code for: bulldoze the wild bits, slap down manicured lawns, install “accessible paved trails” (translation: hot concrete in July), and—wait for it—plastic playground equipment on shredded rubber. You know, because nothing says “nature” like the scent of melting tire mulch wafting on the breeze.

They've closed it. For a year.

A YEAR.

I now walk past orange construction fencing like a sad woodland ghost, clutching my reusable coffee cup and whispering, “But the chickadees used to sing here…”

Look, I’m not against improvements. I’m pro-accessibility, pro-family, pro-kiddo-slide joy. But I also wonder… have we lost the ability to just be in nature? Without Wi-Fi? Without signage? Without a QR code that tells us what the squirrel's name is and where to report his behavior?

When did we decide that wild things had to be tamed in order to be enjoyed?

Maybe that’s why I write small-town mysteries. In my stories, the trees don’t wear name tags. The paths meander without a map. There are no souvenir stands or artisan hotdog carts (although honestly, I might steal that for a future book). Just people, community, a whiff of cinnamon cookies, and yes—someone’s probably dead—but it’s all very cozy.

I write about the kind of place where the library still smells like books, the neighbors wave (but also watch you closely if you’re a stranger), and you can sit by a lake with a thermos of tea and absolutely no signal.

Some say that place doesn’t exist anymore. If that’s true, please don’t tell me.

I’d rather keep dreaming of unpaved trails.

And just to be clear—if you see a slightly feral woman muttering at construction tape near a lake, that’s me. Bring coffee. And possibly a shovel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Writers, Don’t Be a Slave to Word Count: Let the Story Speak for Itself

As writers, we’ve all asked ourselves that nagging question: “Is my book long enough? Too short? How long should it be?” It’s easy to get caught up in the numbers, obsessing over whether our work fits neatly into arbitrary word count guidelines. But here’s the truth: Word count should never dictate the quality of your story. The heart of storytelling lies in the narrative itself, not in how many pages it spans. The Pressure of Word Count From NaNoWriMo goals to publishing industry standards, writers face constant reminders about “acceptable” word counts. A novel must be 80,000-100,000 words. A novella shouldn’t exceed 40,000. Short stories have their own limits. These guidelines are helpful, but they can also be stifling. We begin to pad scenes unnecessarily or trim meaningful moments just to conform to these benchmarks. I’ve been there. I’ve wrestled with my manuscript, forcing it to stretch or condense to meet expectations. And you know what happened? The authenticity of the...

The Glamorous Life of a Writer (Or, Mostly Just Staring at a Screen)

There’s a persistent rumor floating around that writers live thrilling, adventure-filled lives. Perhaps it’s all the dramatic author portraits on book jackets—moody, windswept, staring off into the distance as if contemplating the fate of the world. Perhaps it’s the movies, where writers are always dashing off to Paris to write the next great novel in a charming café (suspiciously never interrupted by spotty Wi-Fi or overpriced croissants). I hate to break it to you, but real writing? Not quite so cinematic. In reality, my writing days mostly involve staring intensely at my screen, willing the words to appear through sheer force of will. Occasionally, I engage in deep philosophical debates with myself—such as whether my protagonist should turn left or right down a hallway (the fate of the fictional world depends on it). And let’s not forget the highly intellectual process of naming characters, which can take hours because somehow every single name I think of is either the name of ...

Picking a Favorite Character? Impossible!

  The question comes up all the time. It’s inevitable. Like taxes. Or discovering that you’ve been walking around with spinach in your teeth all day. "Who’s your favorite character?" And I should have a definitive answer, right? Like, boom—here’s my favorite! Neatly tied up, no hesitation, no emotional turmoil, no staring off into the middle distance questioning my life choices. But no. That is not how this works. That is not how any of this works. My knee-jerk reaction is always Pixie . Pixie, my telepathic, sass-infused, magical Papillon from the Magical Papillon Mysteries . How could I not pick her? She’s got it all—wit, charm, fluffy ears, and, most importantly, magic. I mean, who wouldn’t want a touch of magic? I can barely find my car keys half the time. Pixie would just twitch an ear, and boom—problem solved. And she’s funny. Not just “accidentally amusing” funny. No, she’s deliberately funny. She says the things we all wish we could say, with perfect comed...